Legal Opinion

Dieterle v. Bourne

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 21, 1943No. 1752PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, P. J.

The above entitled cause is -now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of plaintiff’s appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Ohio.

The plaintiff, John G. Dieterle, on June 3, 1940, filed a petition in the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, Ohio, against George E. Bourne and wife, Nelle O. Bourne, on *553a promissory note, to which were attached certain conditions, seeking to recover the sum of $300.00 and interest, being the face value of the note.

On July 1, 1940, through the application of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fiebig v. BroffordOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Ottawa County Commissioners v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Schubert v. NeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API