Legal Opinion

State v. Ricci

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1996No. 01S01-9505-CR-00085PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, Justice.

In this case we are called upon to determine whether the application of the pre-1989 statute of limitations to the offenses for which defendants were indicted violates the ex post facto provisions of the United States and Tennessee constitutions. We find that the circumstances of this case do not implicate the ex post facto provisions. The applicable statute of limitations does not bar prosecution of defendants for those security fraud violations that occurred after September 28, 1988, or for earlier violations which could not have been reasonably discovered prior to that date.

F…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. EwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Overton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. PearsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. PikeTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Rickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  3. Lupo v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. State v. CasperTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. TaitTennessee Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API