Legal Opinion

People v. Rufa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his challenge to the factual adequacy of his plea allocution (see People v Nash, 38 AD3d 684 [2007]; People v Mydosh, 27 AD3d 580 [2006]; People v Curras, 1 AD3d 445, 446 [2003]). To the extent that the defendant contends that his plea was not knowing or voluntary, his claim is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment on that ground (see People v Elcine, 43 AD3d 1176, 1177 [2007]; People v Nash, 38 AD3d 684 [2007]; People v Burgess, 21 AD3d 904 [2005]). The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. ElcineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. People v. MydoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. EdmunsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. AdamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. KornegayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API