Legal Opinion

UTICA-MOHAWK MILLS v. Orr

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 26, 1955No. 17007PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

This action (under the Declaratory Judgment Act, Sec. 10-2001 et seq., Code of 1952) is for the construction of, and judgment upon, an unappealed award of workmen’s compensation to respondent by the Industrial Commission which was made on Sept. 28, 1953, when respondent was not employed, as follows:

“It is ordered that the defendants shall pay to the claimant, Curtis Orr, compensation equal to sixty (60%) per cent of the difference between the average weekly wage he earned before the injury and the average weekly wage which he is physically able to earn after the injury for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brown v. Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  2. Storm v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Keeter v. CLIFTON MFG. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  4. Spurgeon v. Iowa & Missouri Granite WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Morgan v. Standard Accident Ins.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James v. ANNE'S INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Bowen v. Chiquola Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. James v. ANNE'S INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. James v. ANNE'S INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API