Legal Opinion
Schramm, Inc. v. Hinde
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 22, 1974No. 71 C 2281PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
BAUER, District Judge.
This is an action for a declaratory judgment brought by plaintiff Schramm, Inc. (“Schramm”) against James Nelson Hinde (“Hinde”), the owner of U.S. Patent 3,234,123, and his exclusive licensee under the patent, Hinde Engineering Company. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that the patent is not infringed by the aerated sewage treatment lagoons located at the Village of Aurora, New York, for which plaintiff supplied the aeration tubing and compressors. Defendants have counterclaimed alleging infringement of the patent.
The patent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kolene Corporation, and Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber Scheideanstalt Vormals Roessler v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- The Eimco Corporation v. Peterson Filters and Engineering Company and Komline-Sanderson Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Schramm, Inc. v. Hinde & Hinde Eng. CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Schramm, Inc. v. HindeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981