Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Mansfield
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
I. The Commercial Casualty Insurance Company policy. The policy of insurance which was issued by the plaintiff to the defendant Mansfield was styled a “foreign automobile combination policy.” While it was a single policy, it contained insuring agreements by the Firemen’s Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, as well as the plaintiff company. It was countersigned at Washington, D. C. by American International Underwriters Cor poration as “Foreign Managers for Both Companies,” and the declarations provided that notice of accident or loss should be given to the latter company. The insuring…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. BaumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
- Sheridan v. Massachusetts Fire & Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Matter of Mearian v. Miscall, Mass. Bonding Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dunn v. Traders & General Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Northland Insurance v. New Hampshire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999
- Northland Insurance v. NH InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999