Legal Opinion

People v. Calderon

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1993No. G012721PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

This is our second review of this case. In the first (GO10983), we reversed a count of attempted robbery with directions to dismiss because it was a lesser included offense of a completed robbery set forth in another count. This would have potentially reduced Manuel Lopez Calderon’s twenty-three-year, four-month sentence by one year. We remanded for resentencing to allow the court to restructure the sentence in its discretion. By changing a stayed sentence on one count to a consecutive one, the judge reimposed the original term. We now affirm.

I

Calderon first questions the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. In re CulbrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. SavalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. ZichwicCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. People v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. Wright, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API