Legal Opinion

Port Washington Union Free School District v. Port Washington Teachers Ass'n

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 13, 1978PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

We have said previously that, under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, § 204, subd 1), the scope of permissible collective bargaining between boards of education and teachers associations concerning terms and conditions of employment is broad, "limited by plain and clear, rather than express, prohibitions in the statute or decisional law” (Syracuse Teachers Assn. v Board of Educ., 35 NY2d 743, 744). Equally well established is the restriction upon the freedom to arbitrate imposed by public policy, whether rooted in statute or decisional law or otherwise. (Matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Susquehanna Valley Central School District & Susquehanna Valley Teachers' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Syracuse Teachers Ass'n v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Economico v. Village of PelhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Ass'n & Buffalo Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Cape Elizabeth School Board v. Cape Elizabeth Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Union River Valley Teachers Ass'n v. Lamoine School CommitteeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. School Committee v. Needham Education Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API