Syracuse Teachers Ass'n v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs, in the following memorandum: One should construe the language in Board of Educ. of Town of Huntington v. Associated Teachers of Huntington (30 N Y 2d 122, 130) to mean that collective bargaining under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, § 204, subd. 1) has broad scope with respect to the terms and conditions of employment, limited by plain and clear, rather than express, prohibitions in the statute or decisional law (see, generally, Matter of West Irondequoit Teachers Assn. v. Helsby, 35 N Y 2d 46, citing and discussing *745the Huntington case). Even so, for the reasons…
2Cited by64 opinions
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Cohoes City School District v. Cohoes Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re the Arbitration Between Susquehanna Valley Central School District & Susquehanna Valley Teachers' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Board of Education v. Yonkers Federation of TeachersNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.