Seidel v. City of Seward
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
An elusive street boundary is the object of search. Plaintiffs have pleaded two claims: The boundary is less than 50 feet from a l/64th section line marking the center of the street, and their property was. damaged by defendants in paving the street. After a trial the suit was dismissed.
The controversial line is common to the west side of Second Street in defendant City of Seward and the east side of land owned by plaintiffs and described in the deed to them as bounded by the l/64th section line “subject to the public highway along the East line of said premises.”
Early records indicate an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Bucholz v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1963
- State ex rel. Johnson v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Nebraska City v. Nebraska City Speed & Fair Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Jones v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by7 opinions
- T v. Transmission, Inc. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Bode v. Flobert Industries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
- Gallagher v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
- Bowley v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
- Sioux City Foundry Co. v. City of South Sioux CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.