Legal Opinion · Dissent

Andrie v. Chrystal-Anderson & Associates Realtors, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1991No. Docket 115968Published

1DissentSullivan, J.

I dissent. Under the *338narrow facts of this case, I believe that Slater owed a duty to the Andries with respect to submitting their offer to Mrs. Wyant.

Missing from the majority opinion, but crucial, is a description of the events leading up to the signing of the purchase agreement. During the pertinent period of time, Chrystal-Anderson was the listing broker, and Ted Slater was the listing salesperson for Mrs. Wyant’s home. The Andries had pursued buying the Wyant home since approximately December 1986. Their first purchase offer expired on April 15, 1987. Their second purchase offer on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Duvall v. GoldinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. McMullen v. JoldersmaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Sierocki v. HieberMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API