Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. State

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 3, 2006No. 2050649Published

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

Roger Howard Lindsay, a pro se plaintiff, appeals from a judgment denying his request for the return of property seized incident to a criminal proceeding. We reverse and remand.

The record reflects that on November 20, 2002, a law-enforcement officer obtained a warrant to search Lindsay’s residence. After that search was conducted, numerous items were seized, including, among other things, computer disks, videotapes, a camera, and firearms. On September 20, 2004, Lindsay was convicted in the Escambia Circuit Court of both possessing and possessing with the intent to disseminate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Rafael J. FeliciCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Granger HowellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Dailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  5. Zamudio v. ZamudioCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API