Legal Opinion
Squires v. City of Eureka CA/2
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 2014No. A138768, A139849UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHMAN, J.
Appellants Floyd E. Squires III and Betty Squires (when referred to collectively, plaintiffs) sued the City of Eureka and several individuals. The complaint alleged 10 causes of action, the first seven common law claims, the last three under 42 Unites States Code section 1983. Defendants filed an anti-SLAPP motion, which the trial court granted as to the first seven causes of action, allowing plaintiffs to conduct discovery on the other three. Following such discovery, defendants filed a renewed antiSLAPP motion, which the trial court granted in an extensive order,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Doe v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Cal. Resources Production Corp. v. Antioch City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Jerry Cox v. Mariposa CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020