Legal Opinion

Frohman v. Bar-or

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 1, 1994No. 93-0109PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court dismissed appellants’ petition for a deficiency decree solely because the petition was filed more than one year after the final judgment of foreclosure was entered. We affirm.

In Financial Security Savings & Loan Ass’n v. España River Partnership, 537 So.2d 683, 685 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), we held that “passage of the period of one year without record activity after the final judgment of foreclosure rendered Financial Security’s application for deficiency decree subject to dismissal without prejudice.” See also Fla. R.Civ.P. 1.420(e).

In accordance with the above, we affirm the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Riesgo v. WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Ravel v. RavelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Financial SEC. S & L Ass'n v. Espana River P'shipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frohman v. Bar-OrSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Park Finance of Broward, Inc. v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Demaio v. Coco Wood Lakes Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API