Legal Opinion

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 2005No. C047124PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROME, J.

In this writ proceeding, we are called on to decide whether the failure of a hospital to begin a peer review hearing within the 60-day period provided by subdivision (h) of Business and Professions Code 1 section 809.2 excuses the physician who is subject to peer review from completing the peer review process and permits the physician to bring an immediate tort action for damages and other relief in the superior court. We conclude the answer to that question is “no.” The hospital’s failure to begin the hearing on time, without more, does not render the administrative remedy of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Westlake Community Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Parthemore v. ColCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Nesson v. Northern Inyo County Local Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. DeCambre v. Rady Children's Hospital-San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Crow v. Penrose-St. Francis Healthcare SystemSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  5. Eight Unnamed Physicians v. Medical Executive CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API