Forrest v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Arthur King Forrest appeals his conviction and the ensuing sentence which included habitualization and enhancement.
We affirm the conviction, finding that appellant waived the right to consolidation of the charges against him. Fla. R.Crim.P. 3.151(b); State v. Harris, 357 So.2d 758 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Having done so, he was not entitled to subsequent discharge on the related felony charges after trial on the misdemeanor charges.
The trial court declared appellant a habitual offender, reciting that the court “finds he’s a danger for the community and for the protection of the public, he ought…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Eutsey v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Valdez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993