Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Higgins

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1906No. 14,400PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Cedar county: Guy T. Graves, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Ames, C.

There is no substantial dispu' *' about the facts in this case. Johnson, the appellee, was the owner in fee of 387 *36acres, including his family homestead, of lands situated in Cedar county in this state and was also the owner of leases from the state of 520 acres of adjoining’ school lands, hut he was indebted to one Abbott, who held as security an assignment of the leases and also a mortgage on the lands owned in fee. There was, besides, a small judgment against Johnson which would have been a lien upon his lands except for its dormancy. This state of facts was known to A. M., Merrill…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bigler v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Harrington v. BirdsallNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Frenzer v. DufreneNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Wasson v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lichty v. BealeNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harper v. RunnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lang v. ToddNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Davis v. MersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Twin Towers Development, Inc. v. Butternut Apartments, L.P.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Durland Trust Co. v. AugustynNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API