Luke v. Battle
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sears, Presiding Justice.
We granted a habeas corpus application filed by the appellant, Marcus Luke, to consider whether the habeas court erred (1) in ruling that Brewer v. State1 announced a new rule of criminal procedure, as opposed to a new rule of substantive criminal law, and (2) in applying the so-called “pipeline” rule 2 to conclude that Luke could not rely on Brewer to support his claim that the State convicted him without proving an element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Under the pipeline rule, a new rule of criminal procedure generally applies only to those cases on direct…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Renner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Head v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Head v. StriplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.