Legal Opinion

Luke v. Battle

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 3, 2002No. S02A0088PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

We granted a habeas corpus application filed by the appellant, Marcus Luke, to consider whether the habeas court erred (1) in ruling that Brewer v. State1 announced a new rule of criminal procedure, as opposed to a new rule of substantive criminal law, and (2) in applying the so-called “pipeline” rule 2 to conclude that Luke could not rely on Brewer to support his claim that the State convicted him without proving an element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Under the pipeline rule, a new rule of criminal procedure generally applies only to those cases on direct…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Fiore v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Renner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Head v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  3. Hammond v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  4. Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Head v. StriplingSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API