Legal Opinion

United States v. Schaub

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided April 3, 1952No. 3174PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

This controversy involves the validity of the defendant’s location, under the mining laws, of a sand and gravel claim on June 21, 1951, upon' a part of a tract of 37.5 acres of land on Whipple Creek in the Tongass National Forest, Alaska, which, on February 9, 1951 had been reserved by the Regional Forester for the use of the Bureau of Public Roads as a source of road building material, and on July 26, 1951 withdrawn from entry by the Secretary of the Interior, Public Land Order No. 734, 16 F.R. 7329. This tract is embraced within the exterior boundaries of a tract…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Wolsey v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Libby, McNeil & LibbyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1952
  2. Southern Idaho Conference Association of Seventh Day Adventists, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  3. United States ex rel. Puckett v. LindemuthDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API