People v. Barker
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
A registered sex offender must, within five working days of the offender’s birthday, update his or her registration. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (a)(1)(D).)1 Willful failure to update one’s registration is a felony. (§ 290, subd. (g)(2), hereafter section 290(g)(2).) The question presented by this case is whether the willfulness element of the offense may be negated by just forgetting to register. We conclude it may not be.
Factual and Procedural Background
Because the issue before us is narrow, the facts may be briefly stated. Defendant is a registered sex offender. He was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. DickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Plasencia-Ayala v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.