Legal Opinion

People v. Barker

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2004No. S115438PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

A registered sex offender must, within five working days of the offender’s birthday, update his or her registration. (Pen. Code, § 290, subd. (a)(1)(D).)1 Willful failure to update one’s registration is a felony. (§ 290, subd. (g)(2), hereafter section 290(g)(2).) The question presented by this case is whether the willfulness element of the offense may be negated by just forgetting to register. We conclude it may not be.

Factual and Procedural Background

Because the issue before us is narrow, the facts may be briefly stated. Defendant is a registered sex offender. He was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. SalasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. DickeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In re ColeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Plasencia-Ayala v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API