Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rossi v. Transamerica Car Leasing Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1984No. Docket 73205Published

1DissentM. J. Kelly, P.J.

I respectfully dissent. I believe that there is no enforceable settlement binding the parties in this case. While plaintiffs did not specifically argue at trial that a settlement was never reached, such a posture can be deduced from their argument that, inasmuch as there was no meeting of the minds, there was no contract. In any event, we will consider issues not preserved for appeal where the error is fundamental or apparent. Kline v Kline, 92 Mich App 62, 74; 284 NW2d 488 (1979).

I agree with the majority that an agreement to settle pending litigation is a contract which is governed by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Scholnick’s Importers-Clothiers, Inc v. LentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kline v. KlineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Pedder v. KalishMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Collins v. Searight-Downs Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API