Legal Opinion
Smith v. Texaco, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 20, 1992No. 1—91—0254, 1—91—0255 consPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE BUCKLEY
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff Richard Smith brought action against several defendants, including Texaco, Inc., and Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc. (collectively Texaco), General Gas & Oil Company (General Gas), Mine Safety Appliance Company (Mine Safety), Lamb Airfoil Company, Inc. (Lamb Airfoil), and Bullard Abrasive Products, Inc. (Bullard), for injuries he sustained in an explosion while working on an underground gasoline storage tank. On November 30, 1990, plaintiff negotiated settlements of his claims against Bullard, Mine Safety and Lamb Airfoil…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Wilson v. Hoffman Group, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Lowe v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Barreto v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ziarko v. Soo Line RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Johnson v. United AirlinesIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
- Halleck v. Coastal Building Maintenance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Mahathiraj v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Copper Mountain, Inc. v. Poma of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.