Legal Opinion

Charles Edward Davis v. Peter J. Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1974No. 74-1809PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before CHAMBERS and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BALDWIN * Customs and Patent Judge. PER CURIAM:

The District Court originally granted a conditional writ of habeas corpus, having found that Davis had been deprived of a fair trial by the failure of the prosecution to disclose a laboratory report containing potentially exculpatory evidence. After this Court affirmed that decision in an unreported opinion, the State commenced preparation for a retrial. It was then discovered that certain physical evidence which was the subject of the laboratory report and which all had assumed was still in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Davis v. PitchessDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kermit George Hilliard v. James C. Spalding, Superintendent, and Slade Gorton, Attorney General of the State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Samuel Houston Coleman v. Michael O'leary, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center, and Attorney General of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. NicholsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Jemez Properties, Inc. v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API