Legal Opinion

McCormick Construction Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 26, 1989No. 714-85CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:

This government contract dispute is before the Court for post-trial disposition. Plaintiff, McCormick Construction Co., brought this action on behalf of its subcontractor, Western Well & Pump, Inc., for increased costs of performance allegedly incurred by Western while drilling three production water wells. Plaintiff asserted two distinct theories of recovery, a differing site condition claim and a breach of contract claim allegedly due to the withholding of superior knowledge.

FACTS

On February 14, 1984, The United States Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Flippin Materials Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Stuyvesant Dredging Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Servidone Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Hardwick Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Renda Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API