Legal Opinion
Vivid, Inc. v. Fiedler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1994No. 90-2787PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.
This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals, Vivid, Inc. v. Fiedler, 174 Wis. 2d 142, 497 N.W.2d 153 (Ct. App. 1993), reversing a summary judgment of the Rock County Circuit Court dismissing Vivid's petition to institute condemnation proceedings. The issue we address on this appeal is whether sec. 84.30(6), Stats., 1 requires payment of just compensation for signs that the DOT required Vivid to remove in the course of a highway expansion project. We conclude that sec. 84.30(6) requires payment of just compensation because Vivid meets both of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LAMAR-ORLANDO, ETC. v. City of Ormond BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Vivid, Inc. v. FiedlerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- City of Fort Collins v. Root Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- City of Whitewater v. Vivid, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- National Advertising Co. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vivid, Inc. v. FiedlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Motors Liquidation Co. Avoidance Action Trust ex rel. Wilmington Trust Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- TFJ Nominee Trust v. State Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Lamar Central Outdoor v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- City of La Crosse v. The Lamar CompaniesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.