Legal Opinion

State v. Rome

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1990No. 16668Published

1Opinion of the Court

452 N.W.2d 790 (1990)

STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Anthony ROME, Sr., Defendant and Appellant.

No. 16668.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Considered on Briefs January 11, 1990.

Decided March 14, 1990.

Frank E. Geaghan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre (Roger A. Tellinghuisen, Atty. Gen., Pierre, on brief), for plaintiff and appellee.

Steve Miller, Sioux Falls, for defendant and appellant.

MILLER, Justice.

In this appeal, we reverse the holding of the trial court which prevented the defendant from presenting evidence in support of a justification/necessity defense in a parental childnapping…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. PatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. State v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API