Legal Opinion
Biodynamic Technologies, Inc. v. Chattanooga Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided April 23, 1987No. 85-6069-CIV-EPSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SPELLMAN, District Judge.
This CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant’s, CHATTANOOGA CORPORATION, Motion for Summary Judgment as to Count IV of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and also as to the appropriate measure of damages to be awarded in a case involving the misappropriation of a trade secret. This Court previously issued one Memorandum Opinion in this case on August 19, 1986, 644 F.Supp. 607, wherein Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts III, VII and X of the Amended Complaint was granted. Counts I, II, V, VI…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fowler v. Happy Goodman FamilyTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
- University Computing Co. v. Lykes-Youngstown Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. American Fundware, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Salsbury Laboratories, Inc. v. Merieux Laboratories, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989
- Kroger v. Legalbill.Com LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Michael J. D'Alessandro v. Lake Developers, II, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
- P. Michael Huddleston v. Kenneth L. HarperCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015