Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beauharnais v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 1952No. 118Published

1Dissent

*277Mr. Justice Reed, with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins,

dissenting.

The Fourteenth Amendment of our Constitution forbids that any person be deprived by a state of liberty or property without due process of law. This Illinois conviction subjects petitioner to a fine of $200. The petitioner challenges the validity of the sentence on the ground that his conviction under § 224a, Division 1, of the Illinois Criminal Code1 violates substantive due process. The petition for certiorari phrases the issue thus: “Is the Illinois statute ... as construed ... or applied . . . invalid . . . because it…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API