Beauharnais v. Illinois
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
*277Mr. Justice Reed, with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins,
dissenting.
The Fourteenth Amendment of our Constitution forbids that any person be deprived by a state of liberty or property without due process of law. This Illinois conviction subjects petitioner to a fine of $200. The petitioner challenges the validity of the sentence on the ground that his conviction under § 224a, Division 1, of the Illinois Criminal Code1 violates substantive due process. The petition for certiorari phrases the issue thus: “Is the Illinois statute ... as construed ... or applied . . . invalid . . . because it…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.