Legal Opinion

Herman v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1906No. 14,060PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the district- court for Douglas county: Abraham L. Sutton, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, C.

Fred K. Herman and others obtained a decree in the district court for Douglas county against the city of Omaha and its treasurer, holding special assessments in *490street improvement districts Nos. 598, 658 and 677 invalid, because of the fact that certain of the proceedings relating to such assessments were had at special sessions of the city council, without proper notice of the business to be transacted at such special sessions. The city of Omaha and its treasurer appeal as to paving districts Nos. 653 and 677. The correctness of the decree as to district No. 598 is not complained…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Orleans v. WarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. County of McLean v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Armstrong v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Edwards & Walsh Construction Co. v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Richardson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lennox v. Housing AuthorityNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Reynard v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Reynard v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Tarboro v. . ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Chan v. City of South OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API