Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided June 26, 2008No. 14-06-01035-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEM THOMPSON FROST, Justice.

Appellant was charged by indictment with the felony offense of making a false statement to obtain credit. Under a plea-bargain agreement, appellant pleaded “guilty” to misdemeanor forgery of a writing. Before the trial court rendered judgment, appellant filed a motion to withdraw his “guilty” plea, asserting that, if the trial court were to find him guilty of misdemeanor forgery of a writing, then the trial court’s judgment would be void because the forgery offense is not a lesser-included offense of the offense charged in the indictment. The trial court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Murray, Raymond DesmondCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  2. State v. Austin George Patterson, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  3. Belisario I. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
  4. Ex parte MoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Nicholas Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API