Legal Opinion

Maxwell Operating Co. v. Harper

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON Appeal from the Circuit Court of Davidson County. —M. H. Meeks, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

The petitioner operates the Maxwell House, one of the leading hotels of Nashville, and as a part of its *641equipment has a checkroom near the lobby,' in which rooms the overcoats and small baggage of its guests are kept. Harper, at the time a guest of the house, deposited his overcoat in this room for safe-keeping, and received from the attendant a check, in the form of those there customarily in.use, as follows:

“Accommodation Check.
“Left at owner’s risk. The management will not ■be responsible for loss or damage.
“No. 4554.

[Signed] Maxwell OpeRating Co.”

Harper had been a patron of the hotel for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Railroad v. Gilbert, Parkes & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Justus Gale's Administratrix v. Van Arman & HopkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Crout v. Yazoo & M. V. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frederick Copeland v. Healthsouth/Methodist Rehabilitation Hospital, LPTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Shepherd Fleets, Inc. v. Opryland USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. Andrew Jackson Hotel, Inc. v. PlattCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  4. Kentucky Hotel, Inc. v. CinottiCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  5. Sewell v. Mountain View Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API