Legal Opinion
Bell v. Rogers
Summit County Court of Common Pleas
Decided June 7, 1952No. 184846PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By WATTERS, J.
Conclusions of Fact and Law.
Plaintiff, Peter J. Bell, has been in the beauty shop supply business for a number of years.
Early this year his truck driver and four of his salesmen who called on the beauty operators of Summit, Lorain, Wayne, Medina and Stark Counties, signed up with and joined the defendant Union, of which James Rogers is the business agent. A competitor of Bell known as the K. and J. Beauty Supply had already unionized some time before that.
*387The' four salesmen who signed up were Reese, Cox, Weeks and Jackson, and the truck driver or delivery boy Urich.
In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milk Wagon Drivers Union, Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Crosby v. RathOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Iacomints Restaurant, Inc. v. Hotel Employees Local No. 118Summit County Court of Common Pleas · 1948
- Iacomini's Restaurant, Inc. v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Local No. 118Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by1 opinion
- C. Comella, Inc. v. United Farm Workers Organizing CommitteeOhio Court of Appeals · 1972