Legal Opinion

Hastings Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1953No. Appeal, 125PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The appellant is the owner of a lot of ground, improved with a three-story building, at a comer where Farragut and Market Streets, Philadelphia, intersect. The council of the city, by ordinance, directed the Director of Public Works to enter into contracts for the reconstruction of “Mill Creek Sewer” in Farragut Street within certain specified longitudinal limits. Pursuant to such direction, the Director entered into contracts for the reconstruction of the sewer. In carrying out the work, the contractor excavated Farragut Street to a depth varying from thirty-five…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stork v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. O'Connor v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  3. Change of Grade in Plan 166Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  4. Mellor v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Fyfe v. Turtle Creek BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In re 1301 Filbert Ltd. PartnershipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. GoldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Cochran Coal Co. v. Municipal Management Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API