Legal Opinion

Hackin v. Lockwood

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1966No. 20446_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

361 F.2d 499

H. Samuel HACKIN, Appellant,

v.

Lorna E. LOCKWOOD, Jesse A. Udall, Charles C. Bernstein, Fred C. Struckmeyer, Jr., Ernest W. McFarland, Justices of the Supreme Court and the State Bar of Arizona, Appellees.

No. 20446.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 20, 1966.

Rehearing Denied July 1, 1966.

H. Samuel Hackin, in pro. per.

Mark Wilmer, Richard Mallery, Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, Ariz., for appellees.

Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, Senior District Judge.

BARNES, Circuit Judge:

1

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the United States District Court…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lupert v. California State BarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Bib'le v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Ronwin v. State BarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Ronwin v. State Bar of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Wilson v. Board of GovernorsWashington Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API