Legal Opinion

Lupert v. California State Bar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 1985No. 84-5632PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

The only noteworthy issue in this appeal is the constitutionality of California’s *1327“Baby Bar” requirement. Plaintiff raises numerous other issues, including a challenge to the dismissal of the state agencies under the Eleventh Amendment, which we deal with summarily.

FACTS

Eileen B. Cohen Lupert, appearing in propria persona, challenged the constitutionality of section 6060(g) of the California Business and Professions Code. That section requires that students enrolled at schools unaccredited by the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar of California…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California State and Consumer Affairs Agency Medical Board of California Acupuncture Committee and Marilyn NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Edelstein v. WilentzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7070, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,089 Stuart H. Hirsh v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California: Malcolm L. Lucas Edward Panelli Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald M. George and Dan Lungren, State Attorney General & Acting Personally for His Private Appointee's Financial Gain State Bar of California Ellen R. Peck, Employee of the State Bar as a Claimed Judge David C. Carr, Employee Prosecutor of State Bar Association, Ralph F. Server v. Supreme Court of the State of California State Bar of California, Harold Lenard Perry v. Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California: Malcolm Lucas, Chief Edward Panelli Stanley Mosk Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald George and Dan Lungren Lise Perlman, Edmundo B. Espinoza v. Malcolm Lucas Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of California Kathryn Mickle Stanley Mosk Joyce Kennard Armand Arabian Marvin Baxter Ronald George and Dan Lungren, State Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. David J. Gallo, Movant-Appellant v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Real Party in Interest-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API