Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Vorenberg

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 22, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.

The plaintiffs, the lessees' of the store 169 Summer Street, Boston, under a written lease for the term of ten years from June 15, 1917, by this bill in equity seek to restrain the defendant, their lessor, from interfering with their occupation of the premises and ask that the lease be declared to be in full force and effect. The plaintiff Hartnett sold her interest in the business conducted on the premises to Sullivan before suit was brought. Sullivan appointed one Haley as general manager in control of the business. The master found that the plaintiff *320Sullivan used the premises as a saloon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Suit v. WoodhallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Chase v. Proprietors of the Revere HouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Commonwealth v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Mann v. United Motor Boston Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. ChagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Commonwealth v. PasqualeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  4. Commonwealth v. DemogenesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. SousaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API