Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sousa

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 16, 1992No. 92-P-187PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

After a lengthy trial on three gambling-related charges, the defendant, general manager of Wonderland Greyhound Park in Revere (Wonderland), was convicted of one offense: using a telephone for the purpose of “accepting wagers or bets” on dog races in violation of G. L. c. 271, § 17A. He does not contend on appeal that there was insufficient evidence to justify the conviction. He contends only that the judge’s instructions failed adequately to explain the requirements for conviction. We agree.

The charges arose out of a court-authorized wiretap of the home telephone of Abraham Sarkis, father of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Betty Corporation v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. ChagnonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  4. Commonwealth v. MassodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Turner v. DrakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MarderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. MusgraveMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. FranchinoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. ConleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. United States v. MarderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API