Legal Opinion
Cresswell v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 3, 1959No. 328-55PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARAMORE, Judge.
Plaintiff sues for payment of a delivery of crude asbestos under the terms of a supply contract No. GS-OOP-3176.
The facts are these: Plaintiff has been engaged in the importing business since 1937. Between August 27, 1951, and June 16, 1952, plaintiff negotiated with the General Services Administration for the sale of asbestos. During the negotiations the terms of the contract were explained to her. Plaintiff submitted a sample of the materials offered in connection with National Stockpile Specifications P-80-R. After the sample had been analyzed, plaintiff received a letter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hurd v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
- Seybold v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Sternbergh v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Union Paving Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Perry and Wallis, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc., Third-Party Intervenor v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Crown Laundry & Dry Cleaners, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Emor, Inc. v. Cyprus Mines Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.