Legal Opinion

Buck v. Bilkie

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1933No. 6754PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal by plaintiffs from so much of a decree enjoining further violation of their copyright in a musical composition as denied to them any damages or attorneys’ fees.

In the absence of proof of actual damages, an award of at least $250 damages is mandatory. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co. v. Buck, 283 U. S. 202, 51 S. Ct. 407, 75 L. Ed. 978, construing 17 U. S. C. § 25 (b), 17 USCA § 25 (b), the Copyright Act § 25 (b).

Under section 40 of the act (17 USCA § 40), “the Court may award to the pre- • vailing party a reasonable attorney’s fee.” Any such award is clearly discretionary: We find no abuse of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jewell-LaSalle Realty Co. v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Overman v. LoesserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. Official Aviation Guide Co. v. American Aviation Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  3. United States v. BowdenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  4. Cain v. Universal Pictures Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
  5. Remick Music Corp. v. Interstate Hotel Co. of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API