Gideon v. St. Charles
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Mohave. F. W. Perkins, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
Appellant in his representative capacity instituted this action against appellees upon their past-due promissory note by filing complaint in the superior court of, Mohave county. The four years’ statute of limitation was pleaded by appellees. The facts as disclosed by the pleadings are: Note was dated May 22, 1908, and become due in six months or November 22, 1908. The complaint was filed October 19, 1912, or 33 days before the expiration of four years from date note became due. No summons was issued in the case until June 4, 1913.. Tried without a jury, resulting in judgment for appellees,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ricker, Lee & Co. v. ShoemakerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Wood & Kinkaid v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Provident Mutual Building-Loan Ass'n v. SchwertnerArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Bates v. J. G. Smith & Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
- Wigg v. DooleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JaastadArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Redewill v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Montano v. Scottsdale Baptist Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.