Legal Opinion
(PC) Campbell v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 18, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01172Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SENARBLE CAMPBELL, No. 2:21-cv-01172-KJM-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 ASHLEY SMITH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court is defendant Ivey’s 19 partial motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 ECF 20 Nos. 29. For the reasons discussed below, the undersigned recommends…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Duvall v. County of KitsapCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.