Legal Opinion

Texeramics, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1957No. 16241PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

This appeal from a judgment entered in a condemnation suit brings up for review another instance of court action which, taken for the purpose of expediting, has in fact delayed the final disposition of a law suit. Thus is proved again what needed no proving, that the longest way around is often the shortest way through.

The background against which the action taken below and complained of here must be viewed consists of: (1) a stipulation; 1 (2) an order 2 granting plaintiff’s motion 3 to strike portions of defendant-appellant’s answer and cross-action 4 and “to limit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. 23 Tracts of Land v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949
  2. Atlanta, K. & N. Ry. Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  3. Yarber v. IglehartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Bell v. BeazleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Nicholson v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Chapman v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. DeepRock Disposal Solutions, L.L.C. v. Forté Prods., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Blain's Folding Serv., Inc. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Rambo v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API