Legal Opinion
Hark’n Technologies, Inc. v. Orange Whip Fitness X, LLC
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 28, 2026No. 1:21-cv-00054Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION HARK’N TECHNOLOGIES, INC., M E M O R A N D U M DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART [431] Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FIND DEFENDANT IN CIVIL CONTEMPT v. Case No. 1:21-cv-00054-CMR ORANGE WHIP FITNESS X, LLC, Chief Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero Defendant. Before the court is Plaintiff Hark’n Technologies, Inc.’s (Hark’n) Motion to Find Defendant in Civil Contempt (Motion for Civil Contempt) (ECF 431). The court also considered Defendant Orange Whip Fitness X, LLC’s (Orange Whip) Opposition (ECF 442) and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taggart v. LorenzenSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Scandia Down Corporation, a California Corporation, and Goose Down, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Euroquilt, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.