Legal Opinion

Roy v. Gray

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 2011No. C-100223 and C-100261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Daniel Gray and the Shaw Group, Inc., appeal the trial court’s judgment, entered following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Lawrence and Kathy Roy, denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial. We reverse the trial court’s judgment because the jury’s verdict finding Gray and the Shaw Group negligent was based on improper and prejudicial expert accident-reconstruction testimony from a police officer who had investigated the accident and improper opinion from this police officer and the Roys’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scott v. YatesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Payne v. A.O. Smith Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  3. Estate of Schmidt v. DereniaOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Nicholson v. turner/cargileOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Ratliff v. Brannum, 2008-Ca-05 (12-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MobleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. State v. BradyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State v. MotleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API