Roy v. Gray
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Daniel Gray and the Shaw Group, Inc., appeal the trial court’s judgment, entered following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Lawrence and Kathy Roy, denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial. We reverse the trial court’s judgment because the jury’s verdict finding Gray and the Shaw Group negligent was based on improper and prejudicial expert accident-reconstruction testimony from a police officer who had investigated the accident and improper opinion from this police officer and the Roys’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scott v. YatesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Payne v. A.O. Smith Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Estate of Schmidt v. DereniaOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Nicholson v. turner/cargileOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ratliff v. Brannum, 2008-Ca-05 (12-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MobleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. BradyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. MotleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2023