Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Dieckmann

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1983No. C-820954PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.

This timely appeal follows the trial court’s granting of appellee’s motion for summary judgment on the complaint and counterclaim filed in the action below. The record reveals the following:

In May 1981 appellant, Herbert W. Dieckmann, employed appellee, Milton M. Bloom, to represent him in a divorce action. Appellant terminated appellee’s employment in February 1982; he was granted a divorce decree sometime later. On May 10, 1982, appellee filed suit against appellant for the recovery of attorney’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schmidt v. Hinshaw, Culbertson, Moelmann, Hoban and FullerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Baiko v. MaysOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Georgeoff v. O'BrienOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Applegate v. Dobrovir, Oakes & GebhardtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
  4. Richmond v. NodlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Roberts v. HuttonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API