Gaertner v. Western Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in conversion in the district court for Martin county to recover $126.75. The defendant alleged a counterclaim because of payment to the International Harvester Company. A second action was brought to recover the price of other grain delivered to the Mutual Elevator Company. By stipulation of the parties the actions were tried together. The court made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant in both cases.
Read the full summary
Action in conversion in the district court for Martin county to recover $126.75. The defendant alleged a counterclaim because of payment to the International Harvester Company. A second action was brought to recover the price of other grain delivered to the Mutual Elevator Company. By stipulation of the parties the actions were tried together. The court made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant in both cases. From an order, Quinn, J., denying plaintiff’s motion for amended findings and judgment thereon or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court refusing plaintiff’s motion for amended findings and judgment thereon in his favor, or, in lieu thereof, for a new trial.
Plaintiff, on January 23, 1906, leased by writing a farm to one Fdhlund for the farming season of 1906. Edhlund gave a chattel mortgage on all crops to be grown on the farm during said season, free from incumbrances, and other personal property, to secure three promissory notes. Two of these notes, aggregating $1,062.50, were for two overdue notes not extended; the third, in the sum of $550, was for the 1906 rent. The lease…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Horton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Niles v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Rosemond v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Fournier v. WilsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dahmes v. Industrial Credit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Baker v. Citizens State Bank of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Erickson v. SinykinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Clark v. CorserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Thompson v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.