Legal Opinion
In Re Kaleb D.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 5, 2001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.
[¶ 1] The mother appeals from the judgment entered in the District Court (Pres-que Isle, Griffiths, J.) finding that Kaleb and Jared D. were in circumstances of jeopardy to their health and welfare. She contends, inter alia, that the court erred by: (1) not granting her motion for a summary judgment because the petition was barred under the res judicata doctrine and (2) finding that jeopardy existed as to Kaleb and Jared because there was insufficient record evidence to substantiate the court’s determination. We disagree and affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶2] The Department of Human Services…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beegan v. SchmidtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Camps Newfound/Owatonna Corp. v. Town of HarrisonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- In Re David G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- In Re Heather C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Connecticut National Bank v. KendallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wilmington Trust Company v. Karen Anne Sullivan-ThorneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- 20 Thames Street LLC v. Ocean State Job Lot of Maine 2017 LLCSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2021
- In Re Dorothy V.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- In re Children of Melissa F.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- In re Melissa F.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.