Legal Opinion

State v. Moyer

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 5, 1978PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

This certification requires a review of Fuentes v. State, Del.Supr., 349 A.2d 1 (1975) in which this Court found 11 Del.C. *195§ 641,1 violative of the Due Process Clause and unconstitutional under Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975).

I

In Fuentes, this Court concluded that “the analogy between Maine law,2 stricken down by Mullaney, and our § 641 is unmistakable” (349 A.2d at 5); and we concluded, therefore, that the question of the invalidity of § 641 was settled by the rationale and decision in Mullaney.

But since then, the United States…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  4. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. People v. HudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. State v. CohenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  5. Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API