State v. Moyer
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice:
This certification requires a review of Fuentes v. State, Del.Supr., 349 A.2d 1 (1975) in which this Court found 11 Del.C. *195§ 641,1 violative of the Due Process Clause and unconstitutional under Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 95 S.Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975).
I
In Fuentes, this Court concluded that “the analogy between Maine law,2 stricken down by Mullaney, and our § 641 is unmistakable” (349 A.2d at 5); and we concluded, therefore, that the question of the invalidity of § 641 was settled by the rationale and decision in Mullaney.
But since then, the United States…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- People v. HudyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- State v. CohenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.