United States v. Poland
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED DECISION AND ORDER ON GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION 1
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
Pre-Booker cases consistently held that in granting a prosecutor’s motion to reduce a prison sentence on account of the offender’s substantial assistance to the government after sentencing, the federal sentencing judge could not enlarge the reduction for factors unrelated to the assistance. All those cases, however, applied a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure-Rule 35(b) — that explicitly required the reduction to “reflect” the substantial assistance or to be in “accord” with Sentencing…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. TadioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. PolandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Bear Republic Brewing Co. v. Central City Brewing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
- United States v. JulienDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2008
- United States v. PolandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.