Holliday v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Chief Judge.
Harvey Holliday was convicted on three counts of theft by deception. Following the denial of his amended motion for new trial, he appeals. All five of his enumerations of error concern the use of an interpreter who translated the testimony of three Spanish-speaking witnesses at trial. We find no legal error with respect to use of the interpreter or the interpreter’s performance at trial. Moreover, even if some deficiency or error occurred by virtue of the interpreter’s translation, we conclude that there is no reasonable probability that the deficiency or error contributed…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ramos v. TerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Duran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Ling v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Cisneros v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Cruz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.